This is the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) article for 
rec.music.makers.piano on playing piano from memory.

This FAQ is intended to present questions frequently asked in 
rec.music.makers.piano regarding playing a piano music from 
memory.  It covers some reasons for memorizing, and also some 
pointers on how to go about memorizing piano pieces.  This 
FAQ is posted every month.  Updates, additions, suggestions 
and corrections are always welcome: send e-mail to 
tompkins@cnct.com.

This FAQ is periodically posted to rec.music.makers.piano, 
news.answers and rec.answers.  This FAQ can be retrieved from 
rtfm.mit.edu via anonymous FTP under:

     /pub/usenet/news.answers/music/piano/memory-playing-faq

If you do not have access to anonymous FTP, you may retrieve 
it by sending e-mail to mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with the 
message (leave the subject line blank):

     SEND usenet/news.answers/music/piano/memory-playing-faq

You also have access to rmmp FAQs on WWW:

http://web.mit.edu/afs/athena.mit.edu/user/i/s/isako/www/rmmp-faq.html

=============================================================
Playing from Memory FAQ

You may run a search on the topics using the #) pattern where 
"#" is the topic number.


CONTENTS:

1)  INTRODUCTION

2)  WHY MEMORIZE?
    2.1)   TRADITION AND TODAY
    2.2)   BENEFITS
    2.3)   DRAWBACKS

3)  HOW TO MEMORIZE?
    3.1)   CHOOSING WHAT TO MEMORIZE
    3.2)   THE ROLE OF LISTENING
    3.3)   AT WHAT POINT IN LEARNING A PIECE SHOULD MEMORIZING
           BEGIN?
    3.4)   IDENTIFYING MEMORIZABLE UNITS
    3.5)   MEMORIZING AND INTEGRATING THE UNITS
    3.6)   WORKING BACKWARDS
    3.7)   THE PRACTICAL USE OF THEORY
    3.8)   VISUAL MEMORY
    3.9)   MEMORIZING AWAY FROM THE PIANO
    3.10)  INTRODUCING DIFFICULTIES
    3.11)  TESTING YOUR MEMORY

4)  RETAINING WHAT YOU HAVE MEMORIZED
    4.1)   STRESS AND FORGETTING
    4.2)   SOME PRACTICAL STEPS
    4.3)   MAINTAIN THE OTHER MEMORIES

5)  SOME FURTHER READING

6)  APPENDIX - SOME PSYCHOLOGICAL NOTES

7)  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

__________________________________________________________________

                 FAQ ON PLAYING FROM MEMORY
                       by Phil Tompkins


1)  INTRODUCTION

From time to time people on rec.music.makers.piano have 
raised the question of how to memorize.  Discussions of this 
question inevitably evoked the prior question of whether to 
memorize at all.  This FAQ addresses these two questions.

In preparing this document I am indebted to a number of 
contributers to r.m.m.p.  I have also drawn on some of the 
literature about playing the piano.  In addition, since 
memory is a topic that psychologists investigate, I looked 
briefly into what they had to say that would be relevant.

I do not claim to have all the answers, but I hope to have at 
least presented the major considerations.  There is no single 
set of answers which applies to everyone.  Different people 
have different methods of memorizing, not to mention 
different views on whether to memorize at all.  I tried to 
take these differences into account so as to come up with a 
document which will be of general use.  I have also tried to 
clearly indicate what are my own opinions.

This FAQ has been re-written based on comments, corrections, 
and additional information received in reponse to draft 
versions posted on r.m.m.p.  I will gladly incorporate 
further information into new versions should I continue to 
receive responses.

______________________________________________________________


2)  WHY MEMORIZE?

2.1)  TRADITION AND TODAY

For at least the last 100 years it has been a tradition for 
professional pianists to perform solo works from memory.  
(There have been some notable exceptions - the famous turn-
of-the Century French pianist Raoul Pugno, Dame Myra Hess, 
and Bela Bartok performed with scores.  Svyatoslav Richter 
has done the same "in respect for the composer", as he put it 
in an interview.)  Today, playing from memory is one of the 
abilities a professional is expected to have.  However, the 
tradition is often abandoned in concerts where new 
compositions or contemporary pieces which are difficult to 
memorize are played.

In the past, piano teachers observed the tradition by 
requiring memorization for student recitals regardless of 
whether or not the students would become professionals.  
Nowadays, in deference to individual variations in abilities 
and requirements, some teachers make memorizing optional.

2.2)  BENEFITS

There are a number of benefits to playing from memory:

*  Many pianists, amateurs as well as professionals, can give
   their best attention to making music only after memorizing
   what they play.

*  You can play anywhere there is a piano without having to
   bring printed music along.

*  You do not have to worry about turning pages.

*  You can spend more time looking at where your fingers are
   on the keyboard, if you need to, and thereby be better
   able to land on the right note(s) while executing a leap.

*  You can better work on other aspects of playing which may
   need visual monitoring or other attention, such as
   maintaining proper posture or hand positions.

*  You can play with your eyes closed, or even in the dark.

*  Since memorizing is often a difficult task, you will
   receive a sense of accomplishment from being able to play
   from memory.  

Memorization may provide the only means by which certain 
passages can be played.  Passages of very rapid notes, 
because of their speed, can only be performed automatically, 
that is, from memory.  This is because the feedback 
mechanisms of the brain do not work fast enough to provide 
control at a detail level over movements of great speed.  The 
details of executing very rapid passages must be worked out 
in advance, after which, through practice, they must become 
"pre-programmed".  Playing such rapid passages does not 
require memorizing an entire piece, or even memorizing when 
or on what notes these passages begin.  However, once begun, 
these passages are completed from memory.  If an entire piece 
consists mostly of rapid passages, not memorizing the whole 
piece may turn out to be a hinderance.

2.3)  DRAWBACKS

Playing from memory may not suit everyone, and it has a few 
disadvantages:

*  It is possible to forget while performing.

*  Anxiety about possibly forgetting may mar a performance.

*  Memorizing takes time.  Weighing the benefits, you might
   decide to spend this time in other ways (e.g., learning,
   playing, and therefore becoming able to perform and
   communicate, more music).

*  Students who are not ready to memorize or who can memorize
   only with great difficulty may become discouraged.

*  Reverberations of bad experiences playing from memory at
   an early age in student recitals may be felt for years
   afterward.

Some people feel more secure with a score in front of them 
even when the piece has been memorized.  Although they may 
seldom look at the score, it is always available as a prompt 
or for use in the event of a memory slip.

For amateur pianists, memorizing is an option, and each 
person will have to determine what is best for her/himself.  
The ability to memorize is not the same as the ability to 
make good music, although the former may facilitate the 
latter.

______________________________________________________________


3)  HOW TO MEMORIZE?

3.1)  CHOOSING WHAT TO MEMORIZE

Playing a piece of music is a rather complex task.  Thus it 
is understandable that learning to play from memory may pose 
difficulties.  In fact, some pieces are just too complex for 
most people to memorize.

For someone who has played little or not at all from memory 
and who wants to develop this ability, selecting what to 
memorize is an important choice.  For an initial effort it is 
probably best to choose a piece which is appealing and easy 
to play.

3.2)  THE ROLE OF LISTENING

If a recording or live performance is available, I think it 
may be useful to start out by just listening to the piece.  A 
mental idea of what the piece ought to sound like will be 
needed to shape the sounds produced by physical activity into 
a musical interpretation.  This musical idea will of course 
evolve, even on the fly.

(Some people caution against listening too much to a piece 
before learning to play it, believing that to do so may 
influence you to adopt the interpretation you hear, thereby 
hindering the development of one your own.  This question has 
come up on r.m.m.p.  According to most who addressed it, no 
such harm will come from listening.)

3.3)  AT WHAT POINT IN LEARNING A PIECE SHOULD MEMORIZING
      BEGIN?

Some teachers advocate beginning to memorize a piece when you 
begin to study it.  I tend to think this works best under the 
guidance of a teacher.  On your own you may face too complex 
a task.  And you may end up memorizing such things as 
mistakes or sub-optimum fingering.

Not only will it be simpler to memorize a piece which you 
have already learned using the score, but also by the time 
you have learned to play the piece fairly well this way, you 
have already come much of the way toward memorizing it.  You 
now can play without focusing on as many of the details in 
the score as you did when you began learning the notes, and 
you have formed some sense of the piece's structure.  And if 
you began to study the piece without listening to it, you now 
have a memory of what the piece sounds like.

3.4)  IDENTIFYING MEMORIZABLE UNITS

As with all skills, repetition is required to establish long-
term memory of a piece.  For some people, just playing a 
piece over and over again is sufficient for memorizing it.  
However, the quantity of material that the mind can take in 
and master at once is limited, and for most of us an entire 
piece is too much to deal with in this manner.  The normal 
procedure is to first break the whole piece down into 
manageable parts, or memorizable units.

In doing this you can proceed hierarchically top-downward.  
This gives you a structural overview of the piece.  The major 
divisions may already be indicated in the score as movements, 
and sections at the next lower level by repeat marks.  Pencil 
in the boundaries of further sections and sub-sections based 
on the beginnings, transitions and endings of thematic 
material.  Proceed further downward using phrases and 
"breathing" points, until you have marked off note groups 
which you can memorize without much difficulty.

These bottom-level groups may be the size of a measure or 
even smaller.  They may not correspond to measures at all, 
but rather may begin in one measure and end in the next. 
Their boundaries should not be arbitrary, but rather should 
correspond to the contours of the music.

In addition to mastering note groups in the horizontal 
dimension, it may help to memorize each hand or even each 
voice separately.  Doing so will force you to be more 
conscious of what each hand is playing.  Working on one hand 
at a time is usually necessary for memorizing such pieces as 
fugues, in which each hand has a lot to do independently of 
the other.

3.5)  MEMORIZING AND INTEGRATING THE UNITS

Once the memorizable units have been identified, you can 
proceed one by one to master them and then integrate them 
into the whole of what you have memorized so far.

The number of repetitions required to commit each musical 
unit to long-term memory will vary for each individual and 
among the units themselves.  Do not try to proceed too fast, 
for newly forming memories may be crowded out by subsequent 
ones if the former have not yet solidified.  If today you 
cannot remember what you worked on yesterday, go back and 
work on those parts some more.

It is more effective to memorize in frequent brief practice 
sessions than in fewer longer ones.  Last minute prolonged 
cram sessions work fine for remembering over the short term, 
but long-term retention is poor.  However, if you have four 
months to learn a four movement sonata, it is better to 
acquire a shaky memory of the whole thing the first month and 
improve your memory in the remaining time than it is to learn 
a movement a month.

3.6)  WORKING BACKWARDS

The famous 19th Century teacher Leschetizky taught 
memorization by having his students learn pieces a part at a 
time starting at the end.  They would first memorize, e.g., 
the last measure, then the next to last, then play them 
together (in order), etc.

Learning in reverse probably increases your ability to begin 
somewhere in the middle of a piece if you need to do so.  The 
time you need to do this is when you have had a memory lapse 
while performing and you must recover and carry on.

Another advantage of learning in reverse is that, since many 
pieces are more difficult toward the end, you spend more time 
practicing the more difficult parts.  Always starting over 
from the beginning while integrating all the parts you have 
learned up to now results in devoting the most time to 
practicing the easiest parts!

An alternate approach is taken by Charles Cooke in his book 
"Playing the Piano for Pleasure."  Cooke advocates learning 
the most difficult passages first, even spending so much time 
on them that they become the easiest parts to play.

3.7)  THE PRACTICAL USE OF THEORY

Leschetizky placed great emphasis on theoretical analysis of 
a piece as part of memorizing, as do many teachers today.  I 
presume to question whether this is absolutely necessary to 
memorizing, but it does contribute much.  What you learn from 
a study of music theory is a set of technical concepts with 
which to talk about and analyze music.  These have two 
important uses in memorizing:

First, identifying the components of a piece draws attention 
to all the details of the piece; the increased attention to 
detail helps the memorizing process.  This means that the 
analysis should be done in parallel with or slightly in 
advance of memorizing.

Second, learning is facilitated by what psychologists call 
"verbal mediation", that is, actively using the description 
of what you are to do as a learning tool.  Learning to 
operate the manual gear shift of a car is facilitated by 
using the words "left foot", "clutch pedal", "neutral", etc.  
(Imagine how you would learn without using these words.)  As 
part of the learning process you may even repeat to yourself 
the verbal instructions for shifting gears as you perform the 
corresponding operations.  You can do something similar while 
memorizing music.  For example, you may say to yourself, "The 
piece begins on G, followed by an arpeggio starting on C", 
perhaps in a greatly abbreviated manner.  Later, once the 
skill has become automatic, the words recede into the 
background.

A technical analysis of a piece would include breaking it 
down into formal parts as described above in 3.4 plus 
identifying elements and structures of the following types:

*  harmonic (keys and key changes, chords and chord
   progressions)

*  melodic (themes and voices; turning points; beginning and
   goal notes)

*  rhythmic (meter, tempo)

Also, note repeating patterns and variations of or deviations 
from the patterns.

3.8)  VISUAL MEMORY

Visual memories of scores are retained in varying degrees by 
different people.  I do not know how prevalent the so-called 
"photographic" memory is, nor how people who allegedly have 
this ability use it while playing from memory.  (Do they play 
from the score in the "mind's eye" while playing without it 
physically?)  For most of us visual memory tends to be an 
ability to recollect where things are in the score when we 
refer to it after the piece has been partially or fully 
memorized.  For people who recall more vivid images of the 
score, conceivably these images could serve as cues while 
playing from memory.  Markings made on the score which relate 
to playing from memory may be recalled in this manner also.

3.9)  MEMORIZING AWAY FROM THE PIANO

Time away from the piano can be used to become more familiar 
with the score and analyze it from a theoretical aspect.  It 
can also be used for a form of practice, such as imagining or 
singing the music or/while playing the "air" piano.  Some 
people even learn to reconstruct the score itself from 
memory.

3.10)  INTRODUCING DIFFICULTIES

A number of psychological studies of learning indicate that 
learning in the presence of difficulties, rather than in a 
smooth step-by-step approach, results in better long-term 
retention, although to do so prolongs the learning process 
(Metcalfe and Shimamura).  In the learning of tasks such 
difficulties include

*  Learning several tasks or task portions at once.

*  Varying the sequence of practice from one task or task
   portion to another unpredictably.

*  Having to do the same thing in a variety of different
   ways.

*  Varying the conditions under which the learning takes
   place.

Applying the notion of doing the same thing in a variety of 
ways to memorizing a piano piece might mean playing with 
different rhythms or phrasing, or possibly transposing the 
piece.

The method of learning through introducing difficulties is 
used in some piano memorization classes.  After memorizing 
each hand separately, students may be given the task of 
reversing the hands, that is, playing each hand's part with 
the other hand, first separately, and later with the hands 
together.

As another exercise, a piece may be divided into blocks of 
about 10-15 measures in length.  Each block is numbered.  
After memorizing the blocks, students are asked to play the 
blocks by the numbers in random order.

I would say that exercises of this type probably work best 
when used by an experienced teacher.  In particular, an 
efficient balance must be achieved between learning through 
variations and learning a piece as it will finally be 
performed.  Playing one hand's part with the other hand may 
help to fix the long term memory of the notes, but does not 
result in a firm memory of the optimum fingering.  This 
approach may have implications for the discussion in 3.3 
about whether to begin memorizing a piece when you first 
learn to play the right notes.

3.11)  TESTING YOUR MEMORY

The use of difficulties as described above in 3.10 can be a 
basis for testing how well you have memorized.  Here are a 
few more possible tests.  (You may think of others.)  Note 
that none of these is an absolute indicator, but they may be 
useful gauges depending on your particular abilities.

*  Can you sing or hum all the right notes?

*  Can you play the piece v-e-r-y slowly?

*  Can you make all the right finger motions while pretending
   to play the piece on a table top?

The ultimate test is how you play the piece in a performance 
situation.  The presence of an audience may cause you to play 
a piece which you have worked on for four months as if you 
have worked on it for only two.

_____________________________________________________________


4)  RETAINING WHAT YOU HAVE MEMORIZED

4.1)  STRESS AND FORGETTING

Stress is an enemy of memory.  It tends to make the limbic 
part of the brain, which controls the fight or flight 
responses, predominate over the other functions.  The stress 
of a new situation, such as a different piano or venue, an 
unanticipated distraction, worry about possibly forgetting, 
and, most of all, the presence of an audience or of examiners 
all make remembering difficult and even cause memory lapses.  
Going directly from isolated practice at home to the recital 
stage introduces most of these causes of stress all at once.  
How can such stresses and/or their effects be minimized?

4.2)  SOME PRACTICAL STEPS

Here are some measures one can take against stress:

*  Continue practicing pieces you have already memorized and
   believe you know well, so as to produce what psychologists
   call "overlearning".

*  Prepare for the possibility of forgetting, by learning
   numerous re-start points within a piece and having someone
   interrupt you at random so you can practice recovery.

*  Play often before different groups of people.

*  Practice in the presence of distractions or people who
   make you nervous.

*  Before a performance, practice in the place where the
   performance will occur, using the same piano.

If forgetting turns out to be due not to inadequate 
memorizing but rather to performance anxiety, then it is the 
latter that needs to be addressed.  That is a different 
topic.

4.3)  MAINTAIN THE OTHER MEMORIES

After a piece has become automatic, you can lose your 
theoretical memory of it just like you can forget how to 
explain how you tie your shoelaces.  When you are playing up 
to speed, there is not enough time to think in words about 
all of what you are playing.  Slow practice is one way to 
allow you to bring back and consciously apply your 
theoretical knowledge.  Maintaining your ability to think of 
the piece in terms of the identity of its notes and 
structures will in turn assist you in recovering from a 
memory lapse.

Likewise, if you use your visual memory of the score to 
provide cues, then, as your automatic memory becomes solid 
and your playing has become independent of the score, you may 
need to maintain your visual memory.

_____________________________________________________________


5)  SOME FURTHER READING

Bernstein, Seymour, "With Your Own Two Hands: Self-Discovery 
Through Music".  New York, G. Schirmer, 1981.
Contains a long chapter on memorizing, including a very 
thorough discussion and detailed example of the use of 
analysis.

Cooke, Charles, "Playing the Piano for Pleasure."  New York, 
Simon and Schuster, 1941.
Another proponent of analysis.  Recommends giving the 
greatest attention to "fracture" points, so as to make them 
the strongest parts.

Gardner, Howard, "Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple 
Intelligences".  New York, Basic Books, 1985.
Musical and body-kinesthetic abilities, which are both 
involved in memorizing, are presented as distinct types of 
intelligence. Implications for education are considered.  
Also, the Suzuki method is discussed.

Howard, Pierce J., "The Owner's Manual for the Brain".  
Austin, Leornica Press, 1994.
Contains some practical applications of brain research.

Matthay, Tobias, "On Memorizing and Playing From Memory, and 
On the Laws of Practice Generally".  London, Oxford 
University Press, 1926.
A classic on this subject by a prominent pianist of the time.

Metcalfe, Janet, and Shimamura, Arthur P., "Metacognition".  
Cambridge, Massachusetts, M.I.T. Press, 1994.
Contains references to research on the learning of motor 
skills.

Miller, George A., "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus 
Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information."  
Psychological Review 63 (1956): 81-97.

Newman, William S., "The Pianist's Problems".  New York, Da 
Capo Press, 1984.

Rolla, Gregory M.  "Your inner music: creative analysis and 
music memory".   Wilmette, Illiois, Chiron Publications, 
1993.

Seroff, Victor, "Common Sense in Piano Study".  New York, 
Funk & Wagnalls, 1970.

Wilson, Frank R., "Tone Deaf & All Thumbs?".  New York, 
Vintage Books, 1986.
The author, a professor of neurology who began piano lessons 
as an adult, explains the workings of the brain as we make 
and listen to music.

_____________________________________________________________


6)  APPENDIX - SOME PSYCHOLOGICAL NOTES

Since memory is an object of study by psychologists and 
neurologists, I spent a little time trying to find out what 
they discovered that would help us to play the piano from 
memory.  I did find a few practical suggestions (see "Posing 
Difficulties" above).  In general, much of what they say 
tends to confirm the methods that have evolved through the 
practical experience of pianists and piano teachers.  However 
they provide a different way of understanding some of the 
phenomena.  Here are a few psychological points.

Nearly all our voluntary movements involve motor skills.  
These motor skills are not reflexes, at least not in the 
sense that swollowing is, nor are they exercised without 
using the mind.  The muscles are all connected to the brain 
by nerves, and as such are extensions of the brain.  It is 
not accurate to say that rapid passage work is in the muscles 
or in the fingers.  It is executed, unconsciously for the 
most part, under control of the brain's motor cortex, basal 
ganglia and cerebellum, and is monitored and modified in 
flight based on conscious or unconscious feedback provided by 
the senses to the brain.  (Some musical passages are executed 
too fast to be modified at the note level by feedback.  In 
those cases, feedback is used to modify the on-going contour 
of the passage at the note group level.)

Complex skills are built upon previously learned component 
skills:

   "The child first combined reaching and looking into
   grasping; the grasping of single objects evolves into the
   passing of objects from one hand to the other; the use of
   sets of objects for daily tasks is transformed into the
   building of simple structures..." (Gardner, p. 221).

There are analogies in playing an instrument, which is quite 
a complex task indeed.  All one's previously acquired musical 
experience and skills are involved in learning a piece as 
well as in playing a piece from memory.  This experience 
includes such things as facility in playing scales and 
memories of such things as where notes are on the keyboard 
and what notes make up a particular chord.  What you learn 
becomes a tool for further learning.

The "site" of the interaction of conscious behavior and 
learned unconscious behavior is referred to as "working 
memory".  This is where music is processed as we are 
memorizing it and as we attend to playing it.  There is a 
limit to not only the speed of the conscious mind, but also 
to the quantity of things with which it can deal.  
Psychologist George Miller in his landmark paper "The Magical 
Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two" placed this limit at about 
seven discretely different things.  This explains why we need 
to learn in small units, and also why we need to make lots of 
our actions automatic.  It also supports one of the benefits 
of memorizing.  The more we make playing the notes automatic, 
the more we can focus on interpretation and making good 
music.

_____________________________________________________________


7)  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I am grateful to the following people, who have provided 
information for this FAQ or who through their posts to 
r.m.m.p. caused me to think about memorizing: James Douthit, 
Achim Gratz, Alexander Hanysz, Anne Marie Himmelheber, Guy 
Klose, Martha Beth Lewis, Leslie Liu, Toshiro K. Ohsumi, 
Janice Rathmann, Bert Rowson, Dee Stark, Carl Tait, John 
Yeung, and Peter Zakel.  Although for various reasons I chose 
to acknowledge contributions en masse in this section rather 
than indicate specifically who contributed what, I must say 
that I could not have completed this FAQ without you folks, 
nor would it even have occurred to me to begin it.

_____________________________________________________________
end Playing from Memory FAQ


Copyright 1995 by Phil Tompkins, submitted by Isako Hoshino 
with permission from the author.  All rights reserved.  This 
document may be reproduced provided that this copyright 
notice is not removed.  It may not be modified without the 
author's permission.  It may not, either in whole or in part, 
be sold or included in anything which is for sale.

This article is provided "as is" without express or implied 
warranties.  While every effort has been taken to ensure the 
accuracy of the information contained in this article, the 
author or the FAQ maintainer assumes no responsibility for 
errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of 
the information contained herein.

Author: Phil Tompkins
Internet: tompkins@cnct.com

FAQ Maintainer: Isako Hoshino
Internet: isako@mit.edu
US mail:MIT Room 13-3082, Cambridge, MA  02139, USA
=============================================================